In this assignment, you will describe a Clinical Problem that you see or have seen in practice. You will then identify, revise, or develop a policy, protocol, algorithm, or standardized guideline to be used in your practice site that is based on current research evidence. You are proposing the implementation of an intervention that is supported by research; thus you are proposing an evidence-based practice (EBP) project. You are not proposing a study to be conducted in your agency.
This is what I had for discussion post about my paper
What is the goal of this paper?
The goal of this paper will be to prevent or reduce Hospital Acquired Urinary tract infection and to implement effective measure for continued nursing practice and good outcome.
What is the expected nurses role?
The role of the nurse in the prevention of CAUTI is indispensable and is a very important indicator of the level of quality of nursing care. Nurse’s roles and responsibilities in this regard include assessment, collaboration, communication, and implementation of the plan of care to reduce the number of CAUTI. The implementations of these interventions are vital because the success of any organization or change depends on how fast and how well preventions are put in to place, how change is adopted and implemented, and how team work is utilized. As a collaborator, I will have to work with other interdisciplinary team members to achieve the best outcome of this project to promote high quality and effective care. It’s crucial for me to educate the team on how to care for patients with indwelling catheters such as how to properly wash hands, how to use wipes or how to do foley care and how often and how to handle the Foley bags (Blodgett, 2009). This project will also include the patient and their family members in the plan of care and will educate everyone on the prevention of CAUTI.
This evidence based practice project will have a specific site and a success criteria. Developing team and good communication skills between the team will be very important.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Paper
Course Name:Nursing Research
Course Number:
Objective:
- Explain the role of nursing research within clinical practice.
Topic:
Overview
In this assignment, you will describe a patient problem that you see or have seen in practice. You will then identify, revise, or develop a policy, protocol, algorithm, or standardized guideline to be used in your practice site that is based on current research evidence. You are proposing the implementation of an intervention that is supported by research; thus you are proposing an evidence-based practice (EBP) project. You are not proposing a
study to be conducted in your agency.
Your final paper should be no more than 5 pages, which does not include the protocol, policy, or algorithm, and references for your project. This assignment is worth 100 points.
Ideas for Selection of an Evidence-Based Intervention for Practice
Describe a patient problem that is relevant to your practice. It can be any patient care problem or issue that is of interest to you in your current practice or for your future role as an administrator. Find an intervention that is considered effective based on research to manage this problem. Important clinical areas that have been researched include the following:
- Fall prevention or management
- Prevention of pressure ulcers
- IV and/or arterial line management
- Infection control problems—select a specific situation
- Pain identification, documentation, and/or management
- Visitation in ICUs
- Family involvement intervention based on research
- Nurse Retention intervention
- Alternative staffing process
- Safety—pick a specific situation and implement a research-based intervention to manage it.
- Shift of care from hospital to home and/or ambulatory care centers
- Nursing leadership—effective leadership behavior that is research based
- Communication of shift report in specialized way based on research
- Provision of specific aspect of care (research-based intervention) to patients with illness such as hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive lung disease, asthma, obesity, renal problems, gastrointestinal problems, or mental health problems.
Include the following in your paper:
- Introduction—provide a brief introduction of your paper including a purpose statement at the end of the introduction (one paragraph)
- Summarize your project topic—include a summary of the patient problem project you chose and the rationale for choosing it; provide support for choosing your topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem (2-3 paragraphs)
- Literature review—include relevant scholarly, peer-reviewed articles that discuss your patient problem and the proposed intervention.Summarize what is known and not know about the problem selected.At least 3-5 articles should be included in your literature review. (3-5 paragraphs)
- Proposed Change—Discuss your revision/identification/development of a policy/protocol/algorithm/standardized guideline to be used in your practice site; analyze how it will be implemented and potential affected parties. (provide a copy as an appendix to your paper with any relevant references included)If you are revising a current policy/protocol, please include the original, as well. (3-5 paragraphs)
- Conclusion—Summarize your paper including your patient problem and proposed change; do not introduce new information here, simply synthesis the information you provided in your paper
-Rubric for Evidence Based Practice Project Paper
NM465-Evidence Based Practice Project Paper
NM465-Evidence Based Practice Project Paper
Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction/Conclusion
|
30.0 pts
Level 5
Grabs the reader’s attention; provides a complete and concise introduction/conclusion to the paper; a purpose statement relevant to the paper is included.
|
27.0 pts
Level 4
Interesting & might get the reader’s attention; provides a complete introduction/conclusion; purpose statement is included, but is vaguely worded.
|
24.0 pts
Level 3
Relevant but does not engage the reader’s attention; provides an introduction/conclusion, but it is incomplete, lengthy, or too short; purpose statement is included, but is vaguely worded.
|
21.0 pts
Level 2
Relevant but does not engage the reader’s attention; provides an introduction/conclusion, but it is incomplete, lengthy, and/or too short; purpose statement not included
|
18.0 pts
Level 1
Dull or trite introduction/conclusion; incomplete or rambling; no purpose statement included.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Summary
|
30.0 pts
Level 5
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen and the rationale for choosing it; support is provided for chosen topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem; the summary is well-developed and provides sufficient detail.
|
27.0 pts
Level 4
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen and the rationale for choosing it; support is provided for chosen topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem; the summary is developed, but lacks depth.
|
24.0 pts
Level 3
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen; rationale included, but not well-defined; the topic was not supported by literature as a patient problem; the summary is partially developed.
|
21.0 pts
Level 2
Includes an incomplete summary of the patient problem project chosen; rationale, if included, was not well-defined or supported by literature.
|
18.0 pts
Level 1
The summary did not discuss the patient problem; no rationale included; rambling or incoherent ideas.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
|
30.0 pts
Level 5
3-5 relevant, scholarly, peer-reviewed articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are synthesized; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
|
27.0 pts
Level 4
3-5 relevant, scholarly, peer-reviewed articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are included, but findings are not synthesized; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
|
24.0 pts
Level 3
3-5 articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are included, but they are either not relevant, not scholarly, or not peer-reviewed; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
|
21.0 pts
Level 2
Less than 3 articles included OR articles included are not related to the chosen topic; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is not included.
|
18.0 pts
Level 1
Less than 3 articles included; no summary of what is known/not known about the problem not included; rambling or incoherent ideas.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Change
|
30.0 pts
Level 5
The proposed change is discussed in sufficient detail; analysis of implementation is well-developed; potential affected parties are discussed.
|
27.0 pts
Level 4
The proposed change is discussed; analysis of implementation is somewhat developed; potential affected parties are discussed.
|
24.0 pts
Level 3
The proposed change is discussed, but lacks details; analysis of implementation is partially developed; potential affected parties are identified.
|
21.0 pts
Level 2
The proposed change is not discussed sufficiently; analysis of implementation is poorly developed; potential affected parties are identified.
|
18.0 pts
Level 1
The proposed change is not discussed in a coherent manner; analysis of implementation is not included; potential affected parties are not identified.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/APA
|
30.0 pts
Level 5
Mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was used correctly. Thoughts flow cohesively throughout the paper.
|
27.0 pts
Level 4
Minimal grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was followed with minimal mistakes. Thoughts flow cohesively throughout the paper.
|
24.0 pts
Level 3
Moderate amounts of grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was followed but inconsistently; paper does not flow and does not tie the information together.
|
21.0 pts
Level 2
Major grammatical and spelling errors. APA was used incorrectly. Paper does not flow and does not tie the information together.
|
18.0 pts
Level 1
An unacceptable number of spelling, and grammar. APA format was not followed. Rambling or incoherent ideas throughout the paper.
|
0.0 pts
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
|
|
30.0 pts
|
Total Points: 150.0
|
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
response to question two
/in Uncategorized /by Joseph****** please respond to discussion question below add citations and references 🙂 ******
What do the four parts of the Christian biblical narrative (i.e., creation, fall, redemption, and restoration) say about the nature of God and of reality in relation to the reality of sickness and disease? From where would one find comfort and hope in the light of illness according to this narrative? Explain in detail each part of the narrative above and analyze the implications.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
problem set 1 1
/in Uncategorized /by JosephBA 620 Managerial Finance
Group Problem Set 1: This problem Set is based on materials covered in module 1/week 1. It is designed for you to demonstrate your understanding of basic financial statements, financial statement analysis, break-even concepts, financial and operating leverages. Before you start this assignment, please review weeks 1 and 2 materials thoroughly.
Finance date of Adams Stores, Inc. for the year ending 2016 and 2017.
Items
2016
2017
Sales
$3,432,000
$5,834,400
Cash
9,000
7,282
Other Expenses
340,000
720,000
Retained Earnings
203,768
97,632
Long-term debt
323,432
1,000,000
Cost of goods sold
2,864,000
4,980,000
Depreciation
18,900
116,960
Short-term investments
48,600
20,000
Fixed Assets
491,000
1,202,950
Interest Expenses
62,500
176,000
Shares outstanding (par value
= $4.60)
100,000
100,000
Market Price of stock
8.50
6
Accounts Receivable
351,200
632,160
Accounts payable
145,600
324,000
Inventory
715,200
1,287,360
Notes Payable
200,000
720,000
Accumulated Depreciation
146,200
263,160
Accruals
136,000
284,960
Tax Rate
40%
40%
Instructions:
As a group, complete the following activities using the financial information above:
Part 1: Financial Statements
Part 2: Financial Statement Analysis
Current ratio
Quick ratio
Inventory turnover (times)
Average collection period (days)
Total asset turnover (times)
Debt ratio
Times interest earned
Gross profit margin
Net profit margin
Return on total assets
Return on equity
P/E ratio
Return on equity using DuPont Analysis
Part 3: Break-even, Financial and Operating Leverages
Johnson Products, Inc.
Income Statement
For the Year Ended December 31, 2018
Sales (40,000 bags at $50 each) …………………………….
$2,000,000
Less: Variable costs (40,000 bags at $25) …………….
1,000,000
Fixed costs ……………………………………………………..
600,000
Earnings before interest and taxes …………………………
400,000
Interest expense …………………………………………………..
120,000
Earnings before taxes ………………………………………….
280,000
Income tax expense (20%) ……………………………………
56,000
Net income …………………………………………………………
$ 224,000
Based on the information above, calculate (show all calculations and responses in good form):
Specific Instructions:
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
photo journal suicide sudden death and trauma
/in Uncategorized /by JosephPart 1: Select or take pictures that illustrate suicide or sudden death, what causes suicide, coping with losing a loved one, as well as the prevention techniques for suicide and ways to cope with traumatic deaths. The pictures should be posted in the discussion.
Part 2: Write a reflection in APA formatting of approximately 250 words that include discussion of the following items, which will need to be uploaded and summitted:
SLO 5a: Examine how to assist others with the challenges of coping with the suicide of a loved one.
SLO 5: Discuss causes, interventions, prevention techniques, and coping with suicide.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
pm690 park university 2
/in Uncategorized /by JosephIn 350-500 words in APA format, pick a well-known project that went through turmoil during the project phases.
Denote what happened and if the modifications that were added allowed the project to get back on track or if it caused the project to be unsuccessful.
Denote your thoughts as to what could have occurred to make the project more successful or if the project was successful in the end, even more successful.
Cite three scholarly references, including at least two peer-reviewed references from the university library. Sources must be used to enhance the learning experience. By finding a referenced source, you are enhancing the learning experience by searching for another source of information on the topic. Also, please ensure you are using a source that is peer-reviewed to ensure the accuracy of information
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
civil disobedience 3
/in Uncategorized /by JosephCivil Disobedience
Laws in the US are constantly evolving as society continues to evolve. A great example of this evolution is the state of Washington legalizing marijuana. In this week’s lectures we compared the consensus and conflict paradigms and determined that laws can be an example of either paradigm.
Based on your learning answer the following question:
Citizens can express themselves freely in the United States by exercising their Constitutional rights. One way citizens express themselves is through protests.
Based on this fact express your views on the following:
Based on your discussion above answer the following questions:
In your response, discuss the following:
List these three goals in the order of importance and explain your reasoning: (a) allowing the public to express itself (b) protecting the public (c) enforcing the law.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
power points along with summary
/in Uncategorized /by JosephI provided the power point just need information and maybe photos on power points to go along with topic. The topic of my research SOICAL MEDIA ON FAKE NEWS IN THE COLLEGE ERA…… also maybe a graph or two showing the percentage of the research.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
my topic is catheter associated urinary tract infection cauti in hospitals
/in Uncategorized /by JosephIn this assignment, you will describe a Clinical Problem that you see or have seen in practice. You will then identify, revise, or develop a policy, protocol, algorithm, or standardized guideline to be used in your practice site that is based on current research evidence. You are proposing the implementation of an intervention that is supported by research; thus you are proposing an evidence-based practice (EBP) project. You are not proposing a study to be conducted in your agency.
This is what I had for discussion post about my paper
What is the goal of this paper?
The goal of this paper will be to prevent or reduce Hospital Acquired Urinary tract infection and to implement effective measure for continued nursing practice and good outcome.
What is the expected nurses role?
The role of the nurse in the prevention of CAUTI is indispensable and is a very important indicator of the level of quality of nursing care. Nurse’s roles and responsibilities in this regard include assessment, collaboration, communication, and implementation of the plan of care to reduce the number of CAUTI. The implementations of these interventions are vital because the success of any organization or change depends on how fast and how well preventions are put in to place, how change is adopted and implemented, and how team work is utilized. As a collaborator, I will have to work with other interdisciplinary team members to achieve the best outcome of this project to promote high quality and effective care. It’s crucial for me to educate the team on how to care for patients with indwelling catheters such as how to properly wash hands, how to use wipes or how to do foley care and how often and how to handle the Foley bags (Blodgett, 2009). This project will also include the patient and their family members in the plan of care and will educate everyone on the prevention of CAUTI.
This evidence based practice project will have a specific site and a success criteria. Developing team and good communication skills between the team will be very important.
Evidence-Based Practice Project Paper
Course Name:Nursing Research
Course Number:
Objective:
Topic:
Overview
In this assignment, you will describe a patient problem that you see or have seen in practice. You will then identify, revise, or develop a policy, protocol, algorithm, or standardized guideline to be used in your practice site that is based on current research evidence. You are proposing the implementation of an intervention that is supported by research; thus you are proposing an evidence-based practice (EBP) project. You are not proposing a
study to be conducted in your agency.
Your final paper should be no more than 5 pages, which does not include the protocol, policy, or algorithm, and references for your project. This assignment is worth 100 points.
Ideas for Selection of an Evidence-Based Intervention for Practice
Describe a patient problem that is relevant to your practice. It can be any patient care problem or issue that is of interest to you in your current practice or for your future role as an administrator. Find an intervention that is considered effective based on research to manage this problem. Important clinical areas that have been researched include the following:
Include the following in your paper:
-Rubric for Evidence Based Practice Project Paper
NM465-Evidence Based Practice Project Paper
NM465-Evidence Based Practice Project Paper
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction/Conclusion
Level 5
Grabs the reader’s attention; provides a complete and concise introduction/conclusion to the paper; a purpose statement relevant to the paper is included.
Level 4
Interesting & might get the reader’s attention; provides a complete introduction/conclusion; purpose statement is included, but is vaguely worded.
Level 3
Relevant but does not engage the reader’s attention; provides an introduction/conclusion, but it is incomplete, lengthy, or too short; purpose statement is included, but is vaguely worded.
Level 2
Relevant but does not engage the reader’s attention; provides an introduction/conclusion, but it is incomplete, lengthy, and/or too short; purpose statement not included
Level 1
Dull or trite introduction/conclusion; incomplete or rambling; no purpose statement included.
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProject Summary
Level 5
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen and the rationale for choosing it; support is provided for chosen topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem; the summary is well-developed and provides sufficient detail.
Level 4
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen and the rationale for choosing it; support is provided for chosen topic from the healthcare literature showing that this is a patient problem; the summary is developed, but lacks depth.
Level 3
Includes a summary of the patient problem project chosen; rationale included, but not well-defined; the topic was not supported by literature as a patient problem; the summary is partially developed.
Level 2
Includes an incomplete summary of the patient problem project chosen; rationale, if included, was not well-defined or supported by literature.
Level 1
The summary did not discuss the patient problem; no rationale included; rambling or incoherent ideas.
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLiterature Review
Level 5
3-5 relevant, scholarly, peer-reviewed articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are synthesized; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
Level 4
3-5 relevant, scholarly, peer-reviewed articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are included, but findings are not synthesized; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
Level 3
3-5 articles related to patient problem/proposed intervention are included, but they are either not relevant, not scholarly, or not peer-reviewed; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is included.
Level 2
Less than 3 articles included OR articles included are not related to the chosen topic; Summary of what is known/not known about the problem is not included.
Level 1
Less than 3 articles included; no summary of what is known/not known about the problem not included; rambling or incoherent ideas.
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProposed Change
Level 5
The proposed change is discussed in sufficient detail; analysis of implementation is well-developed; potential affected parties are discussed.
Level 4
The proposed change is discussed; analysis of implementation is somewhat developed; potential affected parties are discussed.
Level 3
The proposed change is discussed, but lacks details; analysis of implementation is partially developed; potential affected parties are identified.
Level 2
The proposed change is not discussed sufficiently; analysis of implementation is poorly developed; potential affected parties are identified.
Level 1
The proposed change is not discussed in a coherent manner; analysis of implementation is not included; potential affected parties are not identified.
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar/APA
Level 5
Mostly free of grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was used correctly. Thoughts flow cohesively throughout the paper.
Level 4
Minimal grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was followed with minimal mistakes. Thoughts flow cohesively throughout the paper.
Level 3
Moderate amounts of grammatical and spelling errors. APA format was followed but inconsistently; paper does not flow and does not tie the information together.
Level 2
Major grammatical and spelling errors. APA was used incorrectly. Paper does not flow and does not tie the information together.
Level 1
An unacceptable number of spelling, and grammar. APA format was not followed. Rambling or incoherent ideas throughout the paper.
Level 0
No paper was submitted.
30.0 pts
Total Points: 150.0
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
kindly read the case in the file attached and answer the question
/in Uncategorized /by JosephSkip step number 6 in the decision making model ……………………………
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
week 2 assignment torts
/in Uncategorized /by JosephThe assigned reading and lectures from this module will be useful in completing this assignment. You will also need to refer to a policy description or summary of coverages you find online from an automobile insurance company along with the information in the fact pattern regarding the Declaration Sheet and the Endorsement. Ignore all Endorsements except for the endorsement described in the fact pattern. Use the policy description or summary of coverages you found online for this exercise and the declaration sheet information and endorsement information provided in the fact pattern. Cite the source of the coverage information as well as the company.
Prepare a memorandum of no less than three pages and no more than five pages to “file” addressing the following:
Fact Pattern
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
module 2 question
/in Uncategorized /by JosephWhat are the places you can research to find information on a healthcare organization?
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.