discussion your experiences with writing 1
NursesHomeworkHelp.com prides itself on its team of specialized writers who possess comprehensive knowledge and experience in the field of nursing. These writers are selected through a rigorous vetting process, ensuring that they have the necessary qualifications and expertise in nursing. By engaging writers who understand the intricacies of the nursing profession, NursesHomeworkHelp ensures that students receive accurate and well-researched content that aligns with the unique requirements of the nursing discipline. This specialization sets NursesHomeworkHelp apart as a trusted source of academic support for nursing students.
Discussion: Your Experiences With Writing
Scholarly writing is a key component of your graduate work. A useful first step toward improving your writing skills is to examine your past experience with writing, including your writing strengths and weaknesses. From there, you can target your needs accordingly.
For this Discussion, you will explore the various resources and guidelines outlining an effective writing process and some common writing issues. You will also review the current state of your writing skills and share thoughts and experiences with your colleagues.
This Discussion will also be used to help tailor the individualized feedback provided by your Instructor throughout the duration of the course.
To prepare for this Discussion
- Review and complete the Self-Assessment found in the Learning Resources to develop your needs and goals for this course.
- Reflect on your writing and identify two to three specific areas of concern about your writing that you would like to address.
- Also, consider any particular writing strengths or strategies that may support your writing.
******Post a 1- to 2-paragraph reflection on your writing needs, identifying at least one specific writing issue you want to address in this class. You may also include any writing strengths or strategies that may support your writing. Be sure to connect your scholarly writing skills with professional and academic goals.
Resourses:
https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U…
https://class.waldenu.edu/bbcswebdav/institution/U…
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/te…
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/wr…
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: CAEX_6050_Discussion_Rubric
| Exemplary | Acceptable | Approaching Acceptable | Needs Significant Improvement | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clarity and completeness of ideas |
5 (25%) – 5 (25%) Clear patterns of idea formation. Compelling reasons, detail, and/or examples are provided |
4 (20%) – 4 (20%) Idea formation lacks sufficient evidence and support. Reasons, detail, and/or examples are included but are not clearly linked to the idea. |
3 (15%) – 3 (15%) Evidence or support for ideas is poorly developed. Vague or unsupported reasons, details, and/or examples are given. |
0 (0%) – 2 (10%) No attempt has been made to tie ideas to evidence or logic. No reasons, detail, or examples are given. |
| Grammar/mechanics |
5 (25%) – 5 (25%) Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are exemplary. |
4 (20%) – 4 (20%) Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are mostly consistent with the conventions of academic English. |
3 (15%) – 3 (15%) Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are not consistent with conventions of academic English. |
0 (0%) – 2 (10%) Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are unacceptable for scholarly writing. |
| Addressing task |
5 (25%) – 5 (25%) Addresses all aspects of the task fully and completely. |
4 (20%) – 4 (20%) Addresses the task with occasional divergences and/or omissions. |
3 (15%) – 3 (15%) Attempts to address the task but leaves important areas of question unanswered. |
0 (0%) – 2 (10%) Response does not address the task. |
| Responses to other students |
5 (25%) – 5 (25%) Responds in a thoughtful or probing way to extend the conversation. |
4 (20%) – 4 (20%) Minimal response to two classmates. |
3 (15%) – 3 (15%) Responds to only one classmate completely or to two classmates incompletely. |
0 (0%) – 2 (10%) Does not respond or responds superficially. |
| Total Points: 20 |
|---|
Name: CAEX_6050_Discussion_Rubric
NursesHomeworkHelp.com places a strong emphasis on delivering high-quality work that meets and exceeds academic standards. The company is committed to upholding excellence in every aspect of their service. The writers at NursesHomeworkHelp conduct thorough research, ensuring that assignments are well-informed and grounded in evidence-based practice. Moreover, they adhere to academic conventions, including proper referencing and citation, to ensure the integrity and credibility of the work. By consistently maintaining high-quality standards, NursesHomeworkHelp enables nursing students to excel academically and develop the necessary skills for their future careers.
Do you need a similar assignment done for you from scratch? We have qualified writers to help you. We assure you an A+ quality paper that is free from plagiarism. Order now for an Amazing Discount!
Use Discount Code "Newclient" for a 15% Discount!
NB: We do not resell papers. Upon ordering, we do an original paper exclusively for you.
